Northbound Primer – Technical Overview

There is a growing body of evidence and interdisciplinary theory suggesting that nanoparticles and optically active materials present in the human body can directly impact neurological function when stimulated by external light sources—a process closely related to what's known in neuroscience as optogenetics.

Originally, optogenetics was a revolutionary technology where researchers genetically modified specific neurons to respond to light. This was done by introducing light-sensitive proteins (like channelrhodopsins or halorhodopsins) into target brain cells, allowing researchers to activate or inhibit those neurons using precise wavelengths of light. The field has provided deep insights into how memory, emotion, and even behavior are modulated at the cellular level.

However, optogenetics has implications that extend beyond controlled lab environments.

In the real world, humans are increasingly exposed to:

• Photoreactive nanoparticles (e.g., titanium dioxide, quantum dots, metallic oxides)
• Environmental nanostructures (from pollution, processed foods, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products)
• Constant EMF and IR light exposure (from smartphones, facial recognition systems, LiDAR, and LED lighting)

These materials accumulate in the body, cross the blood-brain barrier, and embed into tissue, including neuronal structures. Once there, they do not require genetic modification to exhibit optically responsive behavior. Many materials—especially metallic or semiconductive nanoparticles—respond directly to pulsed light, infrared, and radio frequencies. This means stimulation from everyday devices could have subtle but consistent effects on bioelectrical activity.

This presents a very plausible mechanism for:

• Disrupted neurotransmitter activity
• Desynchronization of circadian rhythms
• Blunted emotional regulation
• Induced states of apathy, dissociation, or persistent depressive episodes

If neurons—especially in mood-regulating areas of the brain—are being activated or suppressed artificially via embedded, light-sensitive materials, then these symptoms aren't just psychological. They're electromagnetically induced responses to environmental conditions that were never intended to interface with the nervous system.

It’s also important to note:

• Blue light, infrared pulses, and even subtle flicker rates from screens and lighting systems can trigger these effects.
• Smartphones and wearable tech now use flood illuminators, dot projectors, and IR scanning to constantly map facial movement or track user input.
• These outputs, while not designed for optogenetic influence, interact with biological systems that are increasingly contaminated with optically active materials.

For someone experiencing chronic depression, cognitive fog, or loss of self-coherence, these interactions could be a contributing factor—especially if no clear psychological or situational cause exists.

The goal is not paranoia—it’s precision. This theory isn’t about conspiracy, it’s about recognizing a technological and biochemical feedback loop that the average person is not yet aware of. If we’re now walking around with biological interfaces capable of being influenced by light, then our mental health has become, by extension, a function of our exposure environment.

I have been developing a protocol not as a cure-all, but as a systematic method to reduce optogenetic interference:

• Minimize nanoparticle intake and accumulation
• Disrupt potential structures using thermal, magnetic, and sonic means
• Restore the nervous system to its baseline using environmental alignment and low-tech purification methods

This is about returning to biological autonomy in an increasingly stimulus-rich, optically invasive world.

Bring your questions, your skepticism, and your perspective. This isn’t a mystical framework—it’s a grounded look at what happens when optogenetics leaks out of the lab and into the everyday. And what we might be able to do about it.

Reach out anytime to: jonctaylor@protonmail.com